ButMadNNW

I’ve seen some of the AI art Rayark intends to use for their games. It cannot compare to the beauty created by human artists. Shame on the decision maker who discarded humans like so many disposable scraps of paper just to save a few bucks with subpar imagery. Good luck making any money when people stop buying your awful-looking AI-generated games.

Loved “Deemo” to death, hadn’t found the time to get into the sequel. But hearing that the company fired humans to replace their hard work on the game’s beautiful art with “AI” art has soured my memories of the first game and destroyed my interest in the second. When all artists are out of work, who will the “AI” steal from to produce its inferior junk art, have you considered that? Hire back your human artists and PAY THEM PROPERLY. —— (VERY) old previous review: I love this game and even though I've had it for months and have gotten full combos on most easy/normal tracks, I keep going back

In every Room title, Fireproof Games skillfully toe the line between creepy and scary, with puzzles that hover on a razor’s edge between challenging and difficult. But oh, that intense satisfaction when your brain goes “click”! :-D With the intricacies of Old Sins, I “lost my place” a few times and had to use a hint to give me that “aha!” moment for the next step, but more often than not the hint was a confirmation that my hunch was correct, I just hadn’t quite twisted the puzzle the right way yet or had wandered into the wrong room. Stay alert, inspect everything, and keep details in mind,

The word "game" implies certain things: rules, tasks, puzzles, things you (the player) do to affect the world and advance the story, and a point where you're rewarded with "yes, that is the solution". This app has none of those things. How can you "solve" something when there is no solution to be found, by design? If the developer had honestly classed this as an "interactive narrative", I would have gone in with different expectations and perhaps enjoyed it. But as a "game", I spent maybe 20 minutes staring and poking at the screen, watching odd little video clips with no context, wondering i

I was so excited to see a sequel available, but it has so little in common with the first game. The strength of the first game lay in its simple graphics, clever wordplay, and brain teasers that trip you up while being so obvious in retrospect. ;) Some of that can still be seen in Moron Test 2, but the developers seem to have discovered animation and forgotten their roots. They're over-impressed with "look what we can do!" and have forgotten what made them popular in the first place. The animation is okay, but not what I was looking for in buying this game. The buttons aren't as responsive